Vinsamlegast notið þetta auðkenni þegar þið vitnið til verksins eða tengið í það: http://hdl.handle.net/1946/15477
A few of the main arguments for a World Court of Human Rights are the geographic void in international human rights protection, the need to strengthen the law on the responsibility of Transnational Corporations to respect human rights, and the weak enforceability of international human rights. Recent global issues such as the financial crises and the Arab Spring have caused international human rights protection to come under increasingly intense scrutiny.
In addition to the various existing international human rights instruments, Julia Kozma, Manfred Nowak, and Martin Scheinin have drafted a Consolidated Statute to establish a World Court of Human Rights with an indicative preamble and seven provisional chapters. Analysis of the effectiveness and usefulness of the World Court constitutes the core focus of this research project in light of individual communications within the UN human rights treaty system. In particular, this discussion will assess the World Court's potential impact as a replacement for the current UN treaty based communications procedures.
Skráarnafn | Stærð | Aðgangur | Lýsing | Skráartegund | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BA Thesis Alan Omogbai.pdf | 874.59 kB | Opinn | Heildartexti | Skoða/Opna |