en English is Íslenska

Article University of Akureyri > Rafræn tímarit > Nordicum - Mediterraneum >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1946/1540

  • is Theological Compatibilism and Essential Properties
  • is

    Alvin Plantinga defends Theological Compatibilism (TC) and Essentialism about property possession (E). TC is the claim that human freedom to act otherwise and God's essential omniscience are compatible, while E is the claim that every individual entity whatsoever has a modal profile consisting in having both essential and accidental properties. I purport to show that, if E is assumed in the argument for TC, then the latter leads to a very puzzling upshot. I also intend to show that, even if TC is suitably fixed in order to avoid that upshot, TC is still unconvincing in that it merges into one the de re and the de dicto rendering of 'human freedom to act otherwise'; I end up by briefly sketching why the two renderings should instead be kept well apart.

  • is 1670-6242
  • Jul 2, 2008
  • is http://hdl.handle.net/1946/1540

Files in This Item:
Filename Size VisibilityDescriptionFormat 
Ciprotti.pdf4.5 MBOpenPDFView/Open